Someone hasn’t texted you back.
That’s all that happened. But somehow, by the time you’ve checked your phone for the seventh time, you’re no longer waiting for a text. You’re investigating the collapse of your relationship.
Was it something you said? Have they lost interest? Should you send another message? Absolutely not. Unless you should.
Or maybe someone tells you they’re starting to feel close to you, and suddenly, you feel trapped. Do you really have time for a relationship? You start taking longer to reply, noticing the annoying way they chew, reminding yourself how much easier life was on your own. You liked having them. But now that they’re getting closer, you need some space.
One person looks for reassurance. The other pulls away. And then there’s the securely attached person; the magical unicorn we’ve all heard about. Apparently, these people can fall in love without turning an unanswered text into a crime scene or developing a sudden allergy to commitment when things start going well.
But how do securely attached people feel safe doing something that can hurt so much? They can be rejected, too. Someone they love can still leave. Yet they can let themselves get close without constantly needing proof that everything is okay–or an escape route in case it isn’t. What allows them to trust in love when they have no more protection from heartbreak than anyone else?
To understand that, it helps to start with understanding anxiety.
In his Stanford lectures on human behavioral biology, Robert Sapolsky explains how anxiety draws on the systems involved in fear. Fear helps us respond to an immediate threat, preparing the body for fight or flight. Anxiety mobilizes that same machinery—including the amygdala—in anticipation of what might happen. Evolution builds on what’s already there: a system that helps us respond to danger can also help us prepare for it. Except now, the danger doesn’t have to be in front of us. The perceived possibility of something painful or unbearable can be enough to put us on alert.
Some of that processing can happen before we consciously recognize what set it off. Your heart is already racing, and you’re still trying to figure out why.
There’s a useful protective function here. Anticipating danger gives us a chance to respond before something bad happens. But it also means we can spend a lot of time responding to things that haven’t happened—and might never happen.
When something feels threatening, we often try to do something about it. We tackle the problem, look for answers, or try to regain control. Other times, we avoid the situation altogether. There’s a familiar fight-or-flight logic here: eliminate the threat, or get away from it. These are generally the two strategies employed to resolve anxiety.
Now put that into a relationship.
The possible threat is rejection. Abandonment. Letting someone matter to you, only to discover that you don’t matter to them in the same way.
With anxious attachment, protection can look like reaching for reassurance. Do you love me? Are we okay? Are you sure? If the fear is that someone will leave, confirmation that they’re staying can feel like solving the problem. Except the relief may not last. Another unanswered text, another change in tone, and the questions comes back.
With avoidant attachment, protection can mean creating distance. Depending on someone feels risky, so needing them less—or keeping them from getting too close—can feel safer. Avoidant people can want love, too. The vulnerability that comes with it may be the difficult part.
In the Netflix series Nobody Wants This, Noah shows up to meet Joanne’s family with an enormous bouquet of flowers, eager to make a good impression. Joanne gets “the ick” and starts pulling away.
Here’s a man who likes her, shows up, and wants to be part of her life. Somehow, that becomes a reason to lose interest.
For Joanne, closeness itself seems to be what feels scary. Letting Noah matter to her means becoming vulnerable to losing him. Finding something wrong with him gives her an exit before things get more serious. But that doesn’t have to be a conscious strategy. She may sincerely feel turned off by his eagerness, without recognizing why it suddenly bothers her so much. That’s what makes the scene revealing: she meets someone willing to be a healthy partner, and as the relationship gets closer, something trivial starts to feel like a reason to leave.
Of course, not every loss of attraction is secretly a fear of intimacy. But sometimes, the wall goes up just as someone starts getting close enough to matter.
So if seeking reassurance and pulling away can both be ways of protecting ourselves from getting hurt, what allows securely attached people to feel safe getting close? Heartbreak still hurts them. Someone they love can still leave. There is no attachment style that comes with breakup insurance. So how can they live with that possibility without constantly trying to prevent it?
Security doesn’t mean never feeling anxious. It tends to involve greater trust that support will be available, along with more flexible ways of handling distress. An argument can be addressed. A need can be expressed. Uncertainty doesn’t have to become an emergency.
The way I think about it is this: this relationship matters. Losing it would hurt. But if it ends, I will still have a life on the other side of that pain.
That may never be something a person consciously tells themselves. It can simply be an expectation they carry.
And those expectations have a history.
A young child depends on caregivers for protection and care. Being left without reliable care can involve real danger, at a time when the child has few resources to understand or manage it. Early relationships shape what we later expect from other people, although childhood doesn’t determine every relationship that follows. Later experiences matter, too.
When being left meant feeling overwhelmed and having no one to turn to, we may learn something deeper than “losing someone hurts.” We may learn that losing someone means we’re not safe—that the pain will be more than we can handle.
That expectation can stay with us even as our ability to cope grows. We don’t have to consciously remember those early experiences for closeness to bring up the urge to seek reassurance or pull away. In that sense, these reactions can be attempts to protect us from feeling as helpless as we once did.
As adults, we generally have more choices and resources. We can seek support, leave a relationship, and build new connections. Yet the possibility of being left can still feel overwhelming.
That doesn’t mean every fear comes from childhood. Sometimes a partner really is unreliable, and anxiety is drawing attention to something that needs to change. Security also involves being able to recognize that.
The good news is attachment patterns can change.
Even a loving, consistent partner cannot promise that we will never experience loss. If certainty is what we need to feel safe, reassurance will always have a difficult job.
Part of becoming more secure is developing trust in both directions: trust that other people can care for us, and trust that we can get through disappointment when they can’t.
I don’t think the goal is to become so independent that losing someone means nothing.
It’s being able to love someone deeply, knowing that losing them would hurt, and still trusting, deep down, that we will be okay.
Leave a Reply